Posted: February 26th, 2023
In week three, we were looking at rights ethics with regards to Locke. As a reminder, Locke said we have inalienable rights to life, liberty, and property. It is immoral to violate them. Many think we have more rights than those listed by Locke. Some even think we have a right to health care. That means it is the duty of the state to provide each citizen with their medical needs.
Rights theory says to respect the entitlements we have. If a right is inalienable, it cannot truly be violated ethically even with our consent. We have basic needs. Rights are something beyond needs. They are what we should be authorized to have. We are due what we have a right to. That is not always the case with need. For example, we need food, but people often go hungry. A need refers to something we need physically to exist. A right is a moral entitlement to something. Asking if we have a right to food is a moral question. Needs are determined by the requirements of the body and of material existence. Rights are determined by moral reflection, inquiry, an argument We have a right to own property. We do not need it to live. We could imaginably be allowed to use another’s. We have a right to own a home. We can rent.
For the initial post, respond to one of the following options, and label the beginning of your post indicating either Option 1 or Option 2:
Option 1: Assess the moral solutions arrived at through “care” (care-based ethics) and “rights” ethics to social issues of ethical import such as poverty, drug use, and/or lack of health care,
That is, note any ethical problems that arise related to those particular issues. Then, say how both care-based and rights theory of ethics would solve those problems.
Are those solutions correct? Why or why not?
What is your own approach there?
Option 2: What moral guidelines should we use when it comes to recently introduced healthcare technologies of any kind (you will note and engage with your own examples) and social technologies of any kind (you will note and engage with your own examples)?
Involve care-based ethics in your answer
Threaded discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In the discussions, students will do the following:
· Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week.
· Integrate scholarly resources.
· Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates.
· Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner.
· Post a minimum of 2 substantive posts in each graded discussion: 1 initial post and 1 follow-up post.
· These 2 posts must be on 2 separate days Monday through Sunday. (Initial posts made before Monday will not be graded.)
· The number of graded discussions may vary depending on the course.
· Week 1-7 discussions must be completed by end of week,
Sunday, 11:59 p.m. Mountain Time (MT).
· Week 8 discussion must be completed by end of week,
Saturday, 11:59 p.m. Mountain Time (MT).
Credited means stating where the information came from (specific article, text, or lesson). Examples: our text discusses…., The information from our lesson states…, Smith (2010) claimed that…, Mary Manners (personal communication, November 2017)…
Assigned readings are those listed on the syllabus or assignments page as required reading. This may include text readings, required articles, or required websites.
Scholarly source – per APA Guidelines, only scholarly sources should be used in assignments. These include peer-reviewed publications, government reports, sources written and reviewed by a professional or scholar in the field. Wikipedia, Wikis, .com websites or blogs should not be used as anyone can add information to these sites. Outside sources do not include assigned required readings.
Score: A zero is the lowest score a student can be assigned.
Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.