Posted: June 16th, 2022
wk3_assignment.xlsxwk4_assignment.xlsx
Case UVa Health System: The Long-Term Acute Care Hospital Project Wk 3 is the first of two consecutive weeks on CAPITAL BUDGETING. You will learn the three steps in capital budgeting: 1 Identify relevant incremental cash flows 2 Calculate cost of capital (k-wacc) to use as the discount rate 3 Calculate the metrics of capital budgeting: Net Present Value, Profitability Index, Internal Rate of Return, and Payback Period. Then, you will apply the metrics and information in the case study to make a recommendation whether to accept or reject the LTAC project. The essence of the capital budgeting process is to make sure, BEFORE an investment is made, that its prospective rate of return is high enough to justify the investment. Reading Cohen Finance Workbook chapter 4 is a review of Time Value of Money, which you covered in a previous course. Review it as necessary, but defer the review until you look at the TVM applications in chapter 5 beginning on p 79. You need to know TVM to understand the capital budgeting metrics of NPV, PI, and IRR. Make sure you have that context in mind before reviewing the TVM chapter 4 (only if you need to). Give the Uva Health Care System: The Long-Term Acute Care Hospital Project Case a quick read to understand what is going on – about calculating k-wacc and the decision metrics for the project, to give it either a green light or a red light. Wk 3 gives you practice on the basics. You won’t have a full understanding of what the LTAC Project case is about at the end of Wk3. In Wk4, you will return to the case, analyze the project, and make a recommendation. Look at the Wk 3 assignment questions in the Q1, Q2, Q3 tabs. Read Cohen Finance Workbook chapter 5 selectively. Focus on: See the FLOW DIAGRAM in GREEN depicting the CAPITAL BUDGETING template. See the IS/BS Model in GREEN depicting the connection between PPE (BS) and operating expense (IS). Read pps 61-65 as a general introduction to capital budgeting. Read pps 70-76 on weighted average cost of capital to answer Q1. Read bottom p 67 to 69 on Net Working Capital to answer Q2. Read pps 79-85 on NPV, PI, IRR, PP to answer Q3. Questions See tabs for Q1, Q2, Q3 THESE QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED USING EXCEL. MAKING CALCULATIONS OUTSIDE THE SPREADSHEET AND ENTERING THE RESULTS IS NOT USING EXCEL. YOU MUST USE EXCEL FORMULAS FOR MAKING CALCULATIONS! Case UVa Health System: The LATC Hospital Project Wk 4 is the second of two weeks on CAPITAL BUDGETING Study the Wk 3 Solutions Template before proceeding into Wk 4. Learning Objectives (repeated from Wk3 Assignment Template) You will learn the three steps in capital budgeting: SEE THE FLOW DIAGRAM – YOU ARE NOW WORKING ON THE GREEN-COLORED ANALYSIS. 1 Identify relevant incremental cash flows 2 Calculate cost of capital (k-wacc) to use as the discount rate 3 Calculate the metrics of capital budgeting: Net Present Value, Profitability Index, Internal Rate of Return, and Payback Period. Then, you will apply the metrics and information in the case study to make a recommendation about which of the two projects to accept. The essence of the capital budgeting process is to make sure, before an investment is made, that its prospective rate of return is high enough to justify the investment, i.e., that the project is CREATES value, not DESTROYS value. Directions (some repeating from Wk3 Assignment Template) 1 Make a quick scan through the LTAC case and the exhibits. 2 Listen to the Intro Audio 3 Cohen Finance Workbook chapter 4 is a review of Time Value of Money, which you covered in a previous course. Review it as necessary, but defer the review until you look at the TVM applications in chapter 5 beginning on p 79. You need to know TVM to understand the capital budgeting metrics of NPV, PI, and IRR. Make sure you have that context in mind before reviewing the TVM chapter 4 (only if you need to). 4 Read the case again, to grasp all the details, especially the Mulroney memo to her boss. 5 To understand how a capital budgeting template works, follow the step-by-step procedure in the book, pages 61-70 6 Scan pages 70-76 on weighted average cost of capital. No need to emphasize at this point because discount rates are given in the case. 7 Read pages 79-84 on NPV, PI, IRR, PP. 8 Pages 83-85 show a worked-out example of a capital budgeting decision. Questions If you work with a group, write answers on your own, independently. Group answers violate academic integrity requirements. 1 See Q1 tab. Scroll down until you see the questions. Capital Budgeting Template The template calculates FREE CASH FLOW=[EBIT-TAX+DEPREC]+/-CHANGE NWC+/-CAPEX. 2 See Q2 tab. Scroll down until you see the questions. K-wacc The 1st term is income statement data; the 2nd & 3rd terms are balance sheet data. 3 See Q3 tab. Scroll down until you see the questions. Sensitivity Analysis LEARN THIS FORMULA (EQUATION) COLD! Expect to revisit these calculations and decisions in Wk7.
ATTACHED FILE(S)
Case | UVa Health System: The Long-Term Acute Care Hospital Project |
Wk 3 is the first of two consecutive weeks on CAPITAL BUDGETING. | |
You will learn the three steps in capital budgeting: | |
Identify relevant incremental cash flows | |
Calculate cost of capital (k-wacc) to use as the discount rate | |
Calculate the metrics of capital budgeting: Net Present Value, Profitability Index, | |
Internal Rate of Return, and Payback Period. | |
Then, you will apply the metrics and information in the case study to make a recommendation | |
whether to accept or reject the LTAC project. | |
The essence of the capital budgeting process is to make sure, BEFORE an investment is made, | |
that its prospective rate of return is high enough to justify the investment. | |
Reading | Cohen Finance Workbook chapter 4 is a review of Time Value of Money, which you covered in a previous course. |
Review it as necessary, but defer the review until you look at the TVM applications in chapter 5 beginning on p 79. | |
You need to know TVM to understand the capital budgeting metrics of NPV, PI, and | IRR |
have that context in mind before reviewing the TVM chapter 4 (only if you need to). | |
Give the Uva Health Care System: The Long-Term Acute Care Hospital | Project C |
calculating k-wacc and the decision metrics for the project, to give it either a green light or a red light. | |
Wk 3 gives you practice on the basics. You won’t have a full understanding of what the LTAC Project case is about at | |
the end of Wk3. In Wk4, you will return to the case, analyze the project, and make a recommendation. | |
Look at the Wk 3 assignment questions in the Q1, Q2, Q3 tabs. | |
Read Cohen Finance Workbook chapter 5 selectively. Focus on: | |
See the FLOW DIAGRAM in GREEN depicting the CAPITAL BUDGETING template. | |
See the IS/BS Model in GREEN depicting the connection between PPE (BS) and operating expense (IS). | |
Read pps 61-65 as a general introduction to capital budgeting. | |
Read pps 70-76 on weighted average cost of capital to answer Q1. | |
Read bottom p 67 to 69 on Net Working Capital to answer Q2. | |
Read pps 79-85 on NPV, PI, IRR, PP to answer Q3. | |
Questions | |
See tabs for Q1, Q2, Q3 | |
THESE QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED USING EXCEL. | |
MAKING CALCULATIONS OUTSIDE THE SPREADSHEET AND ENTERING THE RESULTS IS NOT USING EXCEL. | |
YOU MUST USE EXCEL FORMULAS FOR MAKING CALCULATIONS! |
COMPUTE WEIGHTED AVERAGE COST OF CAPITAL | enter data in blue-colored cells | ||||||||||||||||||||||
BASIC: | Formula | Equation | |||||||||||||||||||||
COST OF DEBT: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Coupon Rate | 0.0 | given | |||||||||||||||||||||
Marginal Tax Rate | 0.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of Debt | 0.00% | b5*(1-b6) | k-d = I x (1-t) | ||||||||||||||||||||
weight of debt | d ÷ d+e | ||||||||||||||||||||||
COST OF EQUITY: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk-Free Rate | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk Premium | R-m – R-f | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Beta | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of Equity | b11+(b13*b12) | k-e = R-f + [ß x (R-m – R-f)] | |||||||||||||||||||||
weight of equity | 100 | 1-b8 | e ÷ d+e | ||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted-Average Cost of Capital | (b8*b7)+(b15*b14) | (k-d x wt-d)+(k-e x wt-e) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Above is the template explained in chapter 5 pps 70-76. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Use the template to answer Q1. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Page 75 in Cohen Finance Workbook displays a K-wacc calculation for a company. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Suppose that the inputs to that k-wacc calculation have changed. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
The company’s financial risk has increased, so its coupon rate is now 9%. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Its marginal tax rate increased to 30%. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
To reduce financial risk, its ‘target’ weight of debt is reduced to 30%. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
The risk-free rate on treasury bonds is now 2%. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
The risk premium stays the same at 8%. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
The beta, reflecting higher financial risk, rises to | 1.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Recalculate k-wacc, using the template at the top of this page. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Explain the significance of the change in k-wacc to the capital budgeting analysis and recommendation. Use the box below: |
Go to the bottom of p 68 in the Cohen Finance Workbook. | ||||||||||||
There is no picture of a faucet – but – visualize a sink faucet turning on and off, controlling the flow of water. | ||||||||||||
Picture a receivables faucet, an inventory faucet, and a payables faucet. | ||||||||||||
The number of days can be lower (faucet turned low) or higher (faucet turned high). | ||||||||||||
This is how net working capital is controlled, by setting the number of days of each. | ||||||||||||
The investment in working capital is one of the entries in a forecast. | ||||||||||||
This question helps you learn how to forecast net working capital. | ||||||||||||
Q2a – Explain how the table below works, i.e., what are the inputs, what are the outputs, and how | ||||||||||||
are the inputs transformed into the outputs. | ||||||||||||
HINT: Examine the formulas in the cells. | ||||||||||||
Change in Net Working Capital: | ||||||||||||
Revenue | 1000.0 | |||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 2 | 2.0 | 22.0 | $ signs in the formula ‘fix’ the cell so | ||||||||
Receivables (enter days in Column B) | 82.2 | the formula can be copied to other cells | ||||||||||
Inventory (enter days in Column B) | 3.0 | without changing that cell, i.e., | ||||||||||
Payables (enter days in Column B) | copying on a ‘fixed’ rather than a ‘relative’ basis | |||||||||||
Net working capital needs | 83.7 | |||||||||||
Liquidation of working capital | at the end of a project’s life, working capital is liquidated | |||||||||||
Investment in working capital | ||||||||||||
Answer Q2a in this box: | ||||||||||||
Q2b – Row 43 changes compared to row 14 in Q2a. Explain how the | ||||||||||||
investment in working capital changes (compared to the amount in Q2a) and why. | ||||||||||||
1100.0 | 1200.0 | 1 | 300.0 | 1400.0 | ||||||||
2 | 4.2 | 26.4 | 28.6 | 30.8 | ||||||||
90.4 | 98.6 | 106.8 | 115.1 | |||||||||
3.3 | 3.6 | 3.9 | ||||||||||
1.7 | 1.8 | 2.1 | ||||||||||
92.1 | 100.4 | 108.8 | 11 | 7.2 | ||||||||
8.4 | ||||||||||||
Answer Q2b in this box: | ||||||||||||
Q2c – B71 and B72 are changed from the number of days in Q2a and Q2b. Explain how the | ||||||||||||
investment in working capital changes (compared to the amount in Q2b) and why. | 24.2 | |||||||||||
164.4 | 180.8 | 197.3 | 213.7 | 230.1 | ||||||||
6.0 | 6.6 | 7.8 | ||||||||||
168.9 | 185.8 | 202.7 | 219.6 | 236.5 | ||||||||
16.9 | ||||||||||||
Answer Q2c in this box: |
Recall the | Internal Rate of Return (IRR) | |||||||||
Free cash flow | ||||||||||
Operating cash flow | 72.6 | 88.8 | 105.1 | 109.6 | 124.3 | |||||
Minus: Invesment in net working capital | 12.3 | 3.1 | 0.9 | |||||||
Minus: Investment in PPE (CapEx) | ||||||||||
Plus: Salvage value | ||||||||||
-300.0 | 60.3 | 85.7 | 102.0 | 108.7 | 122.5 | rounding error | ||||
Cumulative free cash flow | -239.7 | -154.0 | -52.0 | 56.7 | 179.2 | |||||
Discount rate (K-wacc) | 10.9% | |||||||||
Net Present Value (NPV) | 43.7 | |||||||||
Profitability Index (PI) | 1.1 | |||||||||
15.9% | ||||||||||
Payback Period (PP) | inspection | |||||||||
The panel above is extracted from p 85 in Cohen Finance Workbook. | ||||||||||
Examine the formulas that calculate NPV, PI, and IRR. | ||||||||||
Estimate PP by inspection using row 9 cumulative free cash flow-the year when cumulative free cash flow becomes a positive number. | ||||||||||
Q3a | ||||||||||
Using the data below for the three projects, and the formulas you discerned in B12, B13, and B14, | ||||||||||
calculate NPV, PI, and IRR for the three projects, using two different k-wacc discount rates, 8% and 11%. | ||||||||||
The data for Projects A,B,C are arrayed vertically; they are the same as row 8 in the horizontal panel above. | ||||||||||
Project A | Project B | |||||||||
Initial Outlay | -50,000 | -100,000 | -450,000 | |||||||
Cash Inflows: Yr 1 | 10,000 | 25,000 | 200,000 | |||||||
Yr 2 | 15,000 | |||||||||
Yr 3 | 20,000 | |||||||||
Yr 4 | ||||||||||
Yr 5 | 30,000 | |||||||||
enter formulas in the cells in this box | ||||||||||
NPV at 8% | ||||||||||
NPV at 11% | ||||||||||
PI at 8% | ||||||||||
PI at 11% | ||||||||||
Q3b | ||||||||||
Interpret the meaning of the calculations you made in Q3a. | ||||||||||
Hint: Do you recommend accepting or rejecting the projects? | ||||||||||
Hint: What is the impact on the decision metrics when k-wacc changes from 8% to 11%? | ||||||||||
Hint: Do all three decision metrics lead to the same recommendation? |
Case | UVa Health System: The LATC Hospital Project | |||||||
Wk 4 is the second of two weeks on CAPITAL BUDGETING | ||||||||
Study the Wk 3 Solutions Template before proceeding into Wk 4. | ||||||||
Learning Objectives | (repeated from Wk3 Assignment Template) | |||||||
You will learn the three steps in capital budgeting: | SEE THE FLOW DIAGRAM – YOU ARE NOW WORKING ON THE GREEN-COLORED ANALYSIS. | |||||||
Identify relevant incremental cash flows | ||||||||
Calculate cost of capital (k-wacc) to use as the discount rate | ||||||||
Calculate the metrics of capital budgeting: Net Present Value, Profitability Index, | ||||||||
Internal Rate of Return, and Payback Period. | ||||||||
Then, you will apply the metrics and information in the case study to make a recommendation | ||||||||
about which of the two projects to accept. | ||||||||
The essence of the capital budgeting process is to make sure, before an investment is made, | ||||||||
that its prospective rate of return is high enough to justify the investment, | ||||||||
i.e., that the project is CREATES value, not DESTROYS value. | ||||||||
Directions | (some repeating from Wk3 Assignment Template) | |||||||
Make a quick scan through the LTAC case and the exhibits. | ||||||||
Listen to the Intro Audio | ||||||||
Cohen Finance Workbook chapter 4 is a review of Time Value of Money, which you covered in a previous course. | ||||||||
Review it as necessary, but defer the review until you look at the TVM applications in chapter 5 beginning on p 79. | ||||||||
You need to know TVM to understand the capital budgeting metrics of | NPV | IRR | ||||||
have that context in mind before reviewing the TVM chapter 4 (only if you need to). | ||||||||
Read the case again, to grasp all the details, especially the Mulroney memo to her boss. | ||||||||
To understand how a capital budgeting template works, follow the step-by-step procedure in the book, pages 61-70 | ||||||||
Scan pages 70-76 on weighted average cost of capital. No need to emphasize at this point because discount rates are | given | |||||||
Read pages 79-84 on NPV, PI, IRR, PP. | ||||||||
Pages 83-85 show a worked-out example of a capital budgeting decision. | ||||||||
Questions | ||||||||
If you work with a group, write answers on your own, independently. Group answers violate academic integrity requirements. | ||||||||
See Q1 tab. | Scroll down until you see the questions. | Capital Budgeting Template | The template calculates FREE CASH FLOW=[EBIT-TAX+DEPREC]+/-CHANGE NWC+/-CAPEX. | |||||
See Q2 tab. | K-wacc | The 1st term is income statement data; the 2nd & 3rd terms are balance sheet data. | ||||||
See Q3 tab. | Sensitivity Analysis | LEARN THIS FORMULA (EQUATION) COLD! | ||||||
Expect to revisit these calculations and decisions in Wk7. |
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long Term Acute Care Hospital | Free Cash Flow Projections | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue and Cost Assumptions | Results-No | NWC Recovery | Results-NWC Recovery | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of Beds | $5,687 | $10,425 | (000 ommited) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year | Utilization | 26% | 17.6% | 21.2% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year 2 Utilization | 60% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Incr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Expense (% of Revenue) | 7.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
VOLUME | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Patient Day Capacity | 18,250 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
62% | 65% | 67% | 70% | 73% | 76% | 79% | 82% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Patient Days Used | 4,745 | 10,950 | 11,388 | 11,844 | 12,317 | 12,810 | 13,322 | 13,855 | 14,409 | 14,986 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Patient Census per Day | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Length of Stay | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of Patients per Year | 158 | 406 | 422 | 439 | 456 | 474 | 493 | 513 | 534 | 555 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full-Time Employees | 4.8 | 3.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
105 | 109 | 114 | 118 | 123 | 128 | 133 | 138 | 144 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INSURANCE PAYER | Patient Mix | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Medicare | 36% | 146 | 152 | 164 | 171 | 178 | 185 | 192 | 200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Medicaid | 29% | 122 | 127 | 132 | 143 | 149 | 155 | 161 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Payers | 24% | 101 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indigent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Billing | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Medicare—bill per patient | $27,795 | 0.0% | 1,583 | 4,058 | 4,220 | 4,389 | 4,565 | 4,747 | 4,937 | 5,135 | 5,340 | 5,554 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Medicaid—bill per patient | $35,000 | 1.3% | 1,605 | 4,170 | 4,337 | 4,510 | 4,691 | 4,878 | 5,073 | 5,276 | 5, | 487 | 5,707 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Payers—bill per day | $2,800 | 5.0% | 3,189 | 7,726 | 8,035 | 8,357 | 8,691 | 9,039 | 9,400 | 9,776 | 10,167 | 10,574 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other—bill per patient | $38, | 500 | 548 | 1,424 | 1,480 | 1,540 | 1,601 | 1,665 | 1,732 | 1,801 | 1,873 | 1,948 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indigent—bill per patient | 111 | 288 | 299 | 311 | 323 | 336 | 350 | 364 | 378 | 394 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Revenue | (000 omitted) | 7,035 | 17,665 | 18,372 | 19,107 | 19,871 | 20, | 666 | 21,493 | 22,352 | 23, | 246 | 2 | 4,176 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Uncollectable | 177 | 184 | 191 | 199 | 207 | 215 | 224 | 232 | 242 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Net Revenue | 6,965 | 17,489 | 18,188 | 18,916 | 19,672 | 20,459 | 21,278 | 22,129 | 23,014 | 23,935 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EXPENSES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Salary, Wage, Benefits (based on $ per employee) | $60,250 | 3,760 | 6,516 | 6,980 | 7,477 | 8,009 | 8,580 | 9,190 | 9,845 | 10,546 | 11,297 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Supplies, Drugs, Food (% net revenue) | 16.3% | 1,135 | 2,851 | 2,965 | 3,083 | 3,207 | 3,335 | 3,468 | 3,607 | 3,751 | 3,901 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Management Fees (% net rev) | 557 | 1,399 | 1,455 | 1,513 | 1,574 | 1,637 | 1,702 | 1,770 | 1,841 | 1,915 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Expenses (fixed + 7 % net rev) | $1,200,000 | 1,688 | 2,424 | 2,473 | 2,524 | 2,577 | 2,632 | 2,689 | 2,749 | 2,811 | 2,875 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land Lease per year | $200,000 | 206 | 212 | 219 | 225 | 239 | 253 | 261 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation (straight line 30yrs) | $15,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Expenses | 7,840 | 13,896 | 14,585 | 15,316 | 16,092 | 16,915 | 17,789 | 18,717 | 19,702 | 20,749 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Profit | (804) | 3,769 | 3,787 | 3,791 | 3,779 | 3,703 | 3,635 | 3,544 | 3,427 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Margin | -11.4% | 21.3% | 20.6% | 19.8% | 19.0% | 18.1% | 17.2% | 15.2% | 14.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Working Capital | Notes: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accounts Receivable | 30 days | 572 | 1,437 | 1,495 | 1,555 | 1, | 617 | 1,682 | 1,749 | 1,819 | 1,892 | 1,967 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inventory Supplies, Drugs, Food | 60 days | 187 | 469 | 507 | 527 | 570 | 593 | 641 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accounts Payable | 234 | 244 | 264 | 274 | 285 | 296 | 308 | 321 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1,672 | 1,739 | 1,808 | 1,880 | 1,956 | 2,034 | 2,115 | 2,200 | 2,288 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in NWC | 1,006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Free Cash Flows | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Add Depreciation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Capital Expenditures | (7,500) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Increase in Net Working Capital | (666) | (1,006) | (67) | (70) | (72) | (75) | (78) | (81) | (85) | (88) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(8,470) | 3,263 | 4,221 | 4,207 | 4,125 | 4,054 | 3,959 | 3,839 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NPV (no recovery in year 10) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IRR (no recovery in year 10) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$2,288 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sale of Facility at Book Value | $10,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NPV with Year 10 Recovery | 16,127 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IRR with Year 10 Recovery | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Profit (Operating Profit – Interest) | (2,004) | 2,569 | 2,587 | 2,591 | 2,579 | 2,551 | 2,503 | 2,435 | 2,344 | 2,227 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Profit/Net Revenue | -28.8% | 14.7% | 13.7% | 13.1% | 12.5% | 11.8% | 11.0% | 10.2% | 9.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study the above analysis carefully, examining the inputs, outputs, and formulas used to do the calculations. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1a | Mulroney did not use working capital cash flows in her original analysis. The analysis above | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
includes incremental investment in working capital. Discuss why she was either correct or incorrect not to | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
include them. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1b | Compare the decision metrics NPV & IRR for the “no recovery of NWC” and “recovery of NWC” scenarios, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
stating which scenario best captures reality. Based on your answer, give the project a green or red light. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1c | Examine the decision metric ‘profit margin’, and explain if it leads to a green or red light for this project. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Even though the board of directors uses this metric, it is defective. Explain why. HINT: FCF definition. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1d | Reconcile your answers to Q1b and Q1c. |
COMPUTE WEIGHTED AVERAGE COST OF CAPITAL | |||||||
BASIC: | Formula | Equation | Case Exhibit 4 | ||||
COST OF DEBT: | U.S. Treasury Yields | ||||||
Coupon Rate | 0.00 | 1-year | 4.77% | ||||
Marginal Tax Rate | 5-year | 4.72% | |||||
Cost of Debt | 0.00% | b5*(1-b6) | k-d = I x (1- t) | 10-year | |||
weight of debt | d ÷ d+e | 30-year | 4.73% | ||||
Data source: http://federalreserve.gov/releases/h15/data.htm (accessed March 2006). | |||||||
COST OF EQUITY: | |||||||
Risk-Free Rate | Corporate Bond Yields | ||||||
Risk Premium | R-m – R-f | AAA | 5.31% | ||||
Beta | AA | 5.38% | |||||
Cost of Equity | b11+(b13*b12) | k-e = R-f + [ß x (R-m – R-f)] | |||||
weight of equity | 100% | 1-b8 | e ÷ d+e | 5.41% | |||
5.45% | |||||||
Weighted-Average Cost of Capital | (b8*b7)+(b15*b14) | (k-d x wt-d)+(k-e x wt-e) | 5.53% | ||||
BBB | 5.62% | ||||||
5.88% | |||||||
For-Profit Comparables | B | BB- | 6.07% | ||||
HCA Inc | Community Health | Health Management Associates | |||||
Revenues (millions) | $24,475 | $3,720 | $3,580 | BB+ | 6.40% | ||
Assets (millions) | $5,222 | $961 | $997 | 6.79% | |||
Total debt (millions) | $9,278 | $1,810 | $1,014 | 6.96% | |||
Stock price ($/share) | $52.12 | $39.73 | $23.25 | ||||
Shares outstanding (millions) | 452.7 | 88.5 | 247.2 | 7.39% | |||
Market cap (millions) | $23,593 | $3,517 | $5,747 | 7.57% | |||
Bond rating | 7.84% | ||||||
Beta | 0.60 | 0.70 | Data source: Bloomberg, “Fair Market Curve Analysis,” 10-Year Corporate Bonds, March 2, 2006. | ||||
Q2a | Calculate the K-wacc for HCA using the template above. Enter the data that you | ||||||
have in the case and the table above. If you need additional data, assume it using | |||||||
your good judgment from what you have learned so far in the course. | |||||||
In the answer box, cite your result, compare it to the K-wacc used in the Q1 | |||||||
analysis, and explain how your revised K-wacc would change the Q1 results. | |||||||
Q2b | If LATC was a project in a for-profit hospital like HCA | ||||||
above, would the NPV be higher or lower? Explain ‘analytically’ by examining | |||||||
all relevant inputs to NPV. | |||||||
Q2c | |||||||
above, would the IRR be higher or lower? Explain. | |||||||
HINT: To avoid getting trapped by this question, make sure your answer is | |||||||
‘analytical’, i.e., examine all relevant inputs and output. | |||||||
Q2d | Can a non-profit hospital accept projects that a for-profit hospital would reject? |
Results-No NWC Recovery | Year 1 Utilization | Annual Increase in Utilization |
10.0% | Full-Time Employees/Census | 5,487 | $38,500 | 20,666 | 23,246 | 24,176 |
1,617 | Free Cash Flows Calculation |
Q3a | The analysis above is identical to the one on the Q1 tab. |
Do a sensitivity analysis by systematically changing certain assumptions in the spreadsheet above: | |
change the K-wacc to 8.3% | |
change year 2 utilization to 45% | |
change commercial payers to 30% of patient mix | |
Use the answer box to prepare a summary of the original (Q1) results | |
and the revised (Q3) results, i.e., a summary table. | |
Q3b | Revise the decision you made in Q1 based on the above sensitivity analysis, comparing Mulroney’s |
assumptions and the sensitivity analysis assumptions to expectations stated in the case. | |
Be sure to consider both ‘hard quantitative data” from decision metrics and ‘soft qualitative information’ | |
from the case. |
Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.