Posted: March 12th, 2023
From Gamble and Gamble (2006): Imagine the following situation. You have a campus job working nights from 6:00pm to midnight in the campus computer lab. It is late and you are alone. You feel particularly uncomfortable because there has been an increase in campus crime and students have been warned to travel in pairs. You are relieved when 12:00am comes and you can leave for home. As you close and begin to lock the door to the computer lab, you hear someone yell, “Wait! Don’t lock the door!” A person runs down the hall towards you and pleads with you to let them into the computer lab so that they can complete a class project that is due the next day. In the haste to get to the lab the person tells you that they forgot their id. You do not recognize the student. Do you trust what they are telling you? Do you let them in and why?
How would the decision you make change (if at all) if the student was female or male? Had a baby face? Was elderly? Was African American, White, Asian or Arab? Poorly dressed? Well dressed? Was wearing a lab coat? Had tattoos? Had body piercings?
Share your reflections while focusing on the concepts of stereotypes and the meaning of communication codes.
1. Explicitly address the selected prompt.
2. Be a maximum length of four (4) pages (12 point font, Times New Roman or Calibri, double-spaced). If you are pursuing the group option, the maximum number of pages is 6 (six). The works cited and title pages do not count towards that limit.
3. Written with clarity and grace (style, structure and mechanics).
4. Incorporate theory and/or scholarly research for at least one of the communication concepts that we have covered in the course (e.g. interpersonal, non-verbal communication).
5. Cite (in text and in the reference list) at least two scholarly sources outside the materials used in the course with an acceptable/established citation format to support your postion.
6. Written in MLA format
Scholarly vs. Non-Scholarly Sources:
https://lgapi-us.libapps.com/widget_c.php?g=336662&p=2266858
Textbook ISBN: 978 - 1- 5249 - 7695 - 8 (If needed)
Introduction to Communication and Information Processes 04:189:101
• Defining ‘communication’ • Communication codes • Basic communication model • Academic Integrity
DEFINING COMMUNICATION
communication vs. Communications
• 126 definitions of communication (Dance & Larson)
– Information passed from one place to
another
What is Communication?• 126 definitions of communication (Dance &
Larson) – Information passed from one place to
another – Procedures by which one mind affects
another What is Communication?• 126 definitions of communication (Dance & Larson) – Information passed from one place to
another – Procedures by which one mind affectsanother – Transmission of information, ideas, emotions
& skills via symbols
What is Communication? • 126 definitions of communication (Dance &
Larson) – Information passed from one place to another – Procedures by which one mind affectsanother – Transmission of information, ideas,
emotions & skills via symbols – Transmission of a message from a source
to a receiver with conscious intent to affect the latter’s behavior
•Human communication is the process through which individuals in relationships, groups, organizations, and societies [respond to and create messages and] create and use information to relate to the environment and one another.
Encoding
Encoding
Decoding
DecodingPerson A
Person B
Environment
EnvironmentFrame of Reference
(
Code
; channel)(Feedback)
External noise
Internal noise
Internal noiseNoise
(Code; channel)
Frame of ReferenceStimulus; Motivation Stimulus; Motivation
Communication Model
Frame of Reference: No identical frames of reference
Communication fallacy
Moving up & down, messages become: --Leveled --Condensed --Assimilated --Embellished
Related principles . . .
Mi ch
ae l N
ew m
an /P
HO TO
ED IT
Through five levels of management . . .
Downward Communication
Through five levels of management . . .Figure 1.3
Through five levels of management . . . Downward Communication Figure 1.3 Through five levels of management . . . Downward Communication Figure 1.3 Through five levels of management . . . Downward Communication Figure 1.3 Through five levels of management . . . Downward Communication Encoding Decoding Person A Frame of ReferenceCode
Frame of ReferenceStimulus; Motivation
Stimulus; MotivationCommunication Model
Decoding Encoding Person BCode . . .
CodeLanguage (verbal)
--tone, pitch, volume
--eye contact, facial expressions, posture, etc.
--spoken or written words
Paralanguage (vocal) Nonverbal (visual)
Vocal & Visual Code
69%
Verbal Code 31%
Encoding Decoding Person A Frame of Reference (Code; channel) (Code; channel) Frame of Reference Stimulus; Motivation Stimulus; Motivation Communication Model Decoding Encoding Person BChannel . . .
Importance of message Needs and abilities of receiver Feedback requirements Need for permanent record Cost Formality desired
Consider how “rich” your channel needs to be . . .
Communicating meaning and emotion
Emoticons used to add meaning and emotion to messages . . .
Feedback . . .
Encoding Decoding Person A Environment Environment Frame of Reference (Feedback) (Code; channel) (Code; channel) Frame of Reference Stimulus; Motivation Stimulus; Motivation Communication Model Decoding Encoding Person BEnvironment . . .
Encoding Decoding Person A Environment Environment Frame of Reference (Feedback) (Code; channel) (Code; channel) Frame of Reference Stimulus; Motivation Stimulus; Motivation Communication Model Decoding Encoding Person B External noise Internal noise Internal noise NoiseNoise (internal and external) . . .
• Process-based
• Complex
• Interactive
• Dynamic
• Vital Life Skill
• 80% of undergraduate students in the US admit to cheating at least once!
• 90% of the students believe that cheaters are neither caught or appropriately disciplined.
RU Academic Integrity Policy-6.2020 Types of Violations
• Standard of Proof- Preponderance of Evidence (51%) • Streamlined process for adjudicating all incidents (all Rutgers
schools under the same policy) • Three Level Structure for Violations • Faculty have more flexibility to adjudicate first time violations • University hearings only for the most serious cases
• Notification
• Investigation
• Resolution
• (
Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.