Posted: April 24th, 2025

Science Module 10: Critical Thinking Assignment Capital Budgeting Justification

 Capital budgeting is an essential process for healthcare organizations. The challenge in quality and patient safety organizations is proving return on the capital investment without revenue impacts.Select a capital investment that you would recommend making for a patient safety concern.  In a 15 slide PowerPoint Presentation address the following requirements:

  • Describe the capital item in detail:

    Item description
    Rationale for selection
    Cost-benefit analysis

  • Complete a capital budget with projected financial benefit:

    Revenue or positive financial impact
    Capital equipment cost
    Personnel cost
    Supply cost

  • Review financial ratios

    Return on investment
    Net Present Value
    Cash Payback period

  • Make a recommendation to lease or finance the capital item. Please support your decision with financial data.

Your presentation should meet the following structural requirements:

  • Be 15 slides in length, not including the title or reference slides.
  • Be formatted according to Saudi Electronic University and APA writing guidelines.
  • Provide support for your statements with citations from a minimum of six scholarly articles. These citations should be listed in the Notes section of the slide in which they appear. Two of these sources may be from the class readings, textbook, or lectures, but four must be external.

    Each slide must provide detailed speaker’s notes to support the slide content. These should be a minimum of 120 words long (per slide) and must be a part of the presentation. 

    CHAPTER 10
    Capital Structure

    In chapter 9, we noted that the weights used in the cost of capital estimate represent the optimal (target) mix of debt and equity financing. These weights are established by the capital structure decision, which requires managers to analyze a number of quantitative and qualitative factors to establish the business’s optimal capital structure.

    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    The Capital Structure Decision
    Capital consists of the funds used to finance a business’s assets.
    Capital structure is the financing mix on the right side of the balance sheet. It is the proportion of debt (and hence equity) used by a business.
    The capital structure decision involves identifying the optimal mix of debt and equity.
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Impact of Capital Structure on
    Risk and Return
    Consider a new for-profit walk-in clinic that needs $200,000 in assets to begin operations.
    The business is expected to produce $150,000 in revenues and $100,000 in operating costs during the first year.
    The clinic has only two capital structure alternatives:
    No debt financing (all equity)
    $100,000 of 10% debt (50/50 mix)
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Projected Balance Sheets
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

     
    All Equity
    Debt/Equity

    Current assets
    $100,000
    $ 100,000

    Fixed assets
    100,000
    100,000

    Total assets
    $200,000
    $ 200,000

     
     
     

    Bank loan (10% cost)
    $ 0
    $ 100,000

    Total equity
    200,000
    100,000

    Total claims
    $ 200,000
    $ 200,000

    Projected Income Statements
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    All Equity
    Debt/Equity

    Revenues
    $ 150,000
    $ 150,000

    Operating costs
    100,000
    100,000

    Operating income (EBIT)
    $ 50,000
    $ 50,000

    Interest expense
    0
    10,000

    Taxable income
    $ 50,000
    $ 40,000

    Taxes (30%)
    15,000
    12,000

    Net income
    $ 35,000
    $ 28,000

    Based on net income, should we use debt financing?

    Return on Equity (ROE)
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    All Equity
    Debt/Equity

    Net income
    $ 35,000
    $ 28,000

    Total equity
    $200,000
    $100,000

    Return on equity
    17.5%
    28%

    Based on ROE, should we use debt financing?

    Conclusions
    Although the use of debt financing lowers net income, it increases the return to equityholders.
    Debt financing allows more of a business’s operating income to flow through to investors.
    Because debt financing levers up (increases) return, its use is called financial leverage.
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Business Risk Versus Financial Risk
    A business has some overall level of risk.
    In a stand-alone risk sense, it can be measured by the standard deviation of ROE.
    In a market risk sense, it can be measured by the stock’s beta.
    This overall (total) risk can be decomposed into business risk and financial risk.
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Business risk is the uncertainty inherent in a business’s operating income (EBIT)—that is, how well can managers predict EBIT?

    Business risk does not consider how the business is financed.
    Business Risk
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Probability
    EBIT
    E(EBIT)
    0
    Low business risk
    High business risk

    Factors That Influence Business Risk
    Demand (volume) variability
    Sales price variability
    Input cost variability
    Ability to respond to changing market conditions (operating flexibility)
    Liability exposure uncertainty
    Operating leverage (proportion of fixed
    versus variable costs)
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    • Demand (volume) variability. Nursing homes have stable demand.
    • Sales price variability. Cosmetic surgery has highly volatile prices.
    • Input cost variability. Pharmaceutical companies have highly uncertain input costs for R&D.
    • Ability to respond to changing market conditions. Some hospitals are in a better position to raise their prices when input costs rise. Other hospitals are more adept at cutting costs if the need arises.
    • Liability exposure uncertainty. Hospitals that perform a large number of high-risk surgeries face more liability risk than do hospitals with a limited surgery program.
    • What is operating leverage? Operating leverage measures the proportion of fixed costs in a business’s cost structure. Hospitals have a high percentage of fixed costs which by definition do not decline when demand falls off.

    ‹#›

    Financial Risk
    Financial risk is the additional risk placed on owners (or noncreditor stakeholders in NFP businesses) when debt financing is used.
    The greater the proportion of debt financing, the greater the financial risk.
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Which of the following statements is most correct?
    A firm’s business risk is determined solely by the financial characteristics of its industry.
    A firm’s financial risk can be minimized by diversification.
    A firm with low business risk is more likely to increase its use of financial leverage than a firm with high business risk, assuming all else equal.
    Home health agencies typically have more operating leverage than hospitals.
    An increase in operating leverage normally leads to a decrease in the standard deviation of its expected EBIT.

    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.
    Self-Test

    Capital Structure Theory
    Capital structure theory attempts to define the relationship between the use of financial leverage and a business’s equity value.
    The most widely accepted theory is the trade-off theory:
    There are tax-related benefits to debt financing.
    But there are also costs, primarily those associated with financial distress.
    But first, we need to discuss MM.
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Modigliani and Miller (MM)
    MM published theoretical papers that changed the way people thought about financial leverage (and dividend policy).
    They won Nobel prizes in economics because of their work.
    MM’s papers were published in 1958 and 1963. Miller had a separate paper in 1977. The papers differed in their assumptions about taxes.
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    MM Assumptions
    Firms can be grouped into homogeneous classes based on business risk.
    Investors have identical expectations about firms’ future earnings.
    There are no transactions costs, so securities can be bought and sold with no fees or commissions.
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    All debt is riskless, and both individuals and corporations can borrow unlimited amounts of money at the risk-free rate.
    All cash flows are perpetuities. This implies perpetual debt is issued, firms have zero growth, and expected EBIT is constant over time.
    There are no agency or financial distress costs.
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.
    MM Assumptions (cont.)

    Proposition I:
    VL = VU.

    Proposition II:
    R(ReL) = R(ReU) + [R(ReU) – R(Rd)](D/E).
    MM Without Taxes (1958)
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    MM Without Taxes Graph
    Cost of Capital (%)
    Proportion of Debt
    R(Re)
    CCC
    R(Rd)

    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    The more debt the firm adds to its capital structure, the riskier the equity becomes and thus the higher its cost.
    Although the cost of debt remains constant (by assumption), the cost of equity increases with leverage at a rate that is exactly sufficient to keep the CCC constant.

    What is the optimal capital structure if this theory holds?
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.
    MM Without Taxes Conclusions

    Value Versus Leverage Graph
    Firm Value
    VL = VU
    Proportion of Debt
    Under MM without taxes, the firm’s value is not affected by debt financing.
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    When corporate taxes are added, the MM propositions become:

    Proposition I:
    VL = VU + TD.

    Proposition II:
    R(ReL) = R(ReU) + [R(ReU) – R(Rd)](1 – T)(D/E).
    MM with Corporate Taxes (1963)
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Cost of Capital (%)
    R(Re)
    CCC
    R(Rd)(1 – T)

    MM with Corporate Taxes Graph
    Proportion of Debt
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    MM with Corporate Taxes Conclusions
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.
    When corporate taxes are added,
    VL ≠ VU. VL increases as debt is added to the capital structure, and the greater the debt usage, the higher the value of the firm.
    The cost of equity increases with leverage at a slower rate when corporate taxes are considered because of the (1 – T) term in Proposition II.
    What is the optimal capital structure if this theory holds?

    VL
    VU
    Under MM with corporate taxes, the firm’s value increases continuously as more and more debt is used.
    TD
    Value Versus Leverage Graph
    Proportion of Debt
    Firm Value
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Miller later (1977) modified the MM with corporate taxes model to incorporate individual (personal) taxes.
    Miller’s Proposition I:
    VL = VU + [1 – ]D.
    Tc = corporate tax rate.
    Td = personal tax rate on debt income.
    Te = personal tax rate on stock income.
    (1 – Tc)(1 – Te)
    (1 – Td)
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Assume Tc = 30%, Td = 35%, and Te = 20%.

    VL = VU + [1 – ]D
    = VU + (1 – 0.86)D
    = VU + 0.14D.
    Value rises with debt; each $100 increase in debt raises L’s value by $14.
    (1 – 0.30)(1 – 0.20)
    (1 – 0.35)
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    How does this gain compare to the gain in the MM model with corporate taxes?
    If only corporate taxes, then
    VL = VU + TcD = VU + 0.30D.
    Here, $100 of debt raises value by $30. But with personal taxes added, firm value increases by only $14. Thus, personal taxes lower the gain from leverage, but the net effect depends on relative tax rates.

    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Impact of Personal Taxes
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.
    Corporate tax laws favor debt over equity financing because interest expense is tax deductible while dividends are not.
    However, personal tax laws favor equity over debt because stocks provide tax deferral, a lower capital gains tax rate, and a lower dividend tax rate.

    Impact of Personal Taxes (Cont.)
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.
    This increases the attractiveness of stock investments (lowers the cost of equity) and hence decreases the spread between debt and equity costs.
    Thus, some of the advantage of debt financing is lost, and debt financing is less valuable to businesses.
    What is the optimal capital structure if the Miller theory holds?

    What does capital structure theory
    prescribe for corporate managers?
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.
    MM, No Taxes: Capital structure is irrelevant—no impact on firm value.
    MM, Corporate Taxes: Value increases, so firms should use (almost) 100% debt financing.
    Miller, Personal Taxes: Value increases, but less than under MM, so again firms should use (almost) 100% debt financing.

    Do firms follow the recommendations
    of capital structure theory?
    Firms don’t follow MM/Miller to 100% debt. Debt ratios average about 40%.
    However, debt ratios did increase after MM. At the time, many thought debt ratios were too low, and MM led to changes in financial policies.
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Financial Distress Costs
    As firms use more and more debt financing, they face a higher probability of future financial distress, which brings with it lower sales, higher costs, lower earnings, and the greater potential of incurring bankruptcy costs. These effects, called financial distress costs, lower the values of stocks and bonds.
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Agency Costs
    As more and more debt is used, managerial actions become more restricted due to restrictive covenants and oversight by creditors. Furthermore, debtholders tend to increase monitoring activity as more debt is used, which raises the cost of debt. Such costs, called agency costs, also lower the values of stocks and bonds.

    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    How do financial distress and agency costs change the MM and Miller models?
    MM/Miller ignored these costs; hence their models show firm value increasing continuously with leverage.
    Because financial distress and agency costs increase with leverage, such costs reduce the value of debt financing.
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    The major contribution of the Miller model is that it demonstrates that:
    Personal taxes increase the value of corporate debt.
    Personal taxes decrease the value of corporate debt.
    Financial distress and agency costs reduce the value of corporate debt.
    Equity costs increase with financial leverage.
    Debt costs increase with financial leverage.

    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.
    Self-Test

    The trade-off theory includes financial distress and agency costs.

    X represents either Tc in the MM model or the more complex Miller term.
    Now, optimal financial leverage involves a trade-off between the tax benefits of debt and financial distress and agency costs.
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.
    VL = VU + XD – – .
    PV of expected
    fin. distress costs
    PV of agency
    costs

    %
    D/A
    R(Re)
    CCC
    R(Rd)(1 – T)

    What is the optimal capital structure?

    Trade-Off Theory
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Trade-Off Theory Implications
    Both too little or too much debt is bad.
    There is an optimal, or target, capital structure for every business that balances the costs and benefits of debt financing.
    Unfortunately, capital structure theory cannot be used in practice to find a business’s optimal structure.
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Trade-Off Theory Implications (cont.)
    Firms should borrow more if they:
    Have low business risk
    Employ tangible assets (buildings and equipment)
    Expect to pay taxes at a high rate
    Firms should borrow less if they:
    Have high business risk
    Employ intangible assets (intellectual capital and goodwill)
    Expect to pay taxes at a low rate
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    ‹#›

    Asymmetric Information Theory
    MM assumed that investors and managers have the same information.
    But managers often have better information. Thus, they would:
    Sell stock if stock is overvalued
    Sell bonds if stock is undervalued
    Investors understand this, so they view new stock sales as a negative signal.

    What are the implications for managers?
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    ‹#›

    Asymmetric Information Theory (cont.)
    In general, mature firms follow a “pecking order” when financing:
    First, use internal funds.
    Next, draw on marketable securities.
    Then, issue new debt.
    Finally, and only as a last resort, issue new common stock.
    This behavior is consistent with the asymmetric information theory.
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    ‹#›

    Summary of Capital Structure Theory
    Both too little or too much debt is bad.
    There is an optimal (target) capital structure for every investor-owned business that balances the costs and benefits of debt financing.
    Specific financing conditions are influenced by asymmetric information.
    Unfortunately, capital structure theory cannot be used in practice to find a business’s optimal structure.
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Not-For-Profit Businesses
    The same general concepts of capital structure apply to not-for-profit businesses:
    Benefit to debt financing—cost of debt is lower because it is tax exempt
    Cost to debt financing—increased risk of financial distress
    However, not-for-profit firms do not have the same financial flexibility as do investor-owned businesses.
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Factors That Influence Capital
    Structure Decisions in Practice
    Long-run viability
    Managerial conservatism
    Lender and rating agency attitudes
    Reserve borrowing capacity
    Industry averages

    Control of investor-owned corporations
    Asset structure
    Growth rate
    Profitability
    Taxes

    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Implications of the
    Capital Structure Decision
    The estimated optimal capital structure becomes the business’s target capital structure.
    It is an important factor in financial decision making because:
    It defines the weights that are used in the corporate cost of capital estimate.
    It plays a role in future financing decisions.
    Note that the target weights are market (as opposed to book) value weights for FP businesses.
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Other things held constant, which of the following events is most likely to encourage a firm to increase the amount of debt in its capital structure?
    Its sales become less stable over time.
    Management believes that the firm’s stock has become overvalued.
    The corporate tax rate increases.
    The costs that would be incurred in the event of bankruptcy increase.
    Its degree of operating leverage increases.

    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.
    Self-Check

    The use of debt financing increases the rate of return to owners, but it also increases their risk.
    Debt financing provides benefits because of the tax deductibility of interest. However, beyond some point, financial distress and agency costs offset the tax advantage of debt.
    Capital structure theory does not provide answers to the optimal capital structure question. Thus, many factors must be considered when actually choosing a firm’s target capital structure, and the final decision will be based on both analysis and judgment.
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.
    Three Key Learning Points

    CHAPTER 10 EXTENSION
    This chapter extension focuses on the debt maturity decision.

    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    The Debt Maturity Decision
    Once the capital structure decision is made, another decision is necessary. Given the optimal amount of debt financing, what is the optimal maturity mix of that debt?
    This decision is based on the business’s mix of permanent and temporary assets.
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Alternative Debt Maturity Policies
    Maturity Matching: Matches the maturity of the assets with the maturity of the financing.
    Aggressive: Uses short-term (temporary) capital to finance some permanent assets.
    Conservative: Uses long-term (permanent) capital to finance some temporary assets.
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    ‹#›

    2

    Years
    $

    Perm C.A.
    Fixed Assets
    Temp. C.A.
    What are “permanent” assets?
    S-T
    Loans
    L-T Fin:
    Stock,
    Bonds,
    Spon. C.L.
    Maturity Matching Financing Policy
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    ‹#›

    3

    Years
    $

    Perm C.A.
    Fixed Assets
    Temp. C.A.
    The lower the dashed line, the more aggressive.
    S-T
    Loans
    L-T Fin:
    Stock,
    Bonds,
    Spon. C.L.
    Aggressive Financing Policy
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    ‹#›

    3

    Conservative Financing Policy
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Fixed Assets
    Years
    $

    Perm C.A.
    L-T Fin:
    Stock,
    Bonds,
    Spon. C.L.
    Marketable Securities
    Zero S-T
    debt

    ‹#›

    4

    Conclusion Regarding Debt Maturities
    The choice of debt maturities is a classic risk/return trade-off.
    The aggressive policy promises the highest return but carries the greatest risk.
    The conservative policy has the least risk but also the lowest expected return.
    The moderate (maturity matching) policy falls between the two extremes.
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    ‹#›

    5

    CHAPTER 11
    Capital Budgeting
    In recent chapters, we focused on capital acquisition, cost of capital, and capital structure—in other words, decisions that provide a business with its capital (funds). Now, we turn our attention to the capital allocation decision, or how those funds can be deployed (used) in the most economically efficient manner.

    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Capital Budgeting Basics
    Capital budgeting is the analysis of potential additions to a business’s fixed assets.
    Such decisions:
    Typically are long-term in nature
    Often involve large expenditures
    Usually define strategic direction
    Thus, capital budgeting decisions are very important to businesses.
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Project Classifications
    Proposed projects are classified according to purpose and size (cost). For example,
    Mandatory replacement
    Expansion of existing services
    Less than $1 million
    $1 million or more
    Expansion into new services
    Less than $1 million
    $1 million or more

    How are such classifications used?
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Role of Project Financial Analysis
    For investor-owned businesses, financial analysis identifies those projects that are expected to contribute to shareholder wealth.
    For not-for-profit businesses, financial analysis identifies a project’s expected effect on the business’s financial condition.

    Why is this important?
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Overview of Capital Budgeting Financial Analysis
    1. Estimate the project’s cash flows:
    Capital outlay
    Operating flows
    Terminal flow
    2. Assess the project’s riskiness.
    3. Estimate the project cost of capital.
    4. Measure the financial impact.
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    ‹#›

    Key Concepts in Cash Flow Estimation
    Identifying the relevant cash flows
    Inc. CF = CF(w/ project) – CF(w/o project)
    Cash flow versus accounting income
    Cash flow timing
    Project life
    Sunk costs
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Key Concepts (cont.)
    Opportunity costs
    Effect on the business’s other projects
    Shipping and installation costs
    Changes in net working capital
    Inflation effects
    Cash flow estimation bias
    Strategic value
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Cash Flow Estimation Example
    Assume Midtown Clinic, a not-for-profit provider, is evaluating a new piece of diagnostic equipment.
    Cost:
    $200,000 purchase price
    $40,000 shipping and installation
    Expected life = 4 years
    Salvage value = $25,000
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

                   

    Cash Flow Estimation Example (cont.)
    Volume = 5,000 scans/year
    Net revenue = $80 per scan
    Supplies costs = $40 per scan
    Labor costs = $100,000
    Neutral inflation rate = 5%
    Corporate cost of capital = 10%

    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Time Line Setup
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4
    OCF1
    OCF2
    OCF3
    OCF4
    Initial
    Costs

    (CF0)
    +
    Terminal
    CF
    NCF0
    NCF1
    NCF2
    NCF3
    NCF4

    Equipment
    $200
    Installation & Shipping
    40
    Net cash outlay
    $240
    Investment at t = 0 (000s)
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Operating cash flows (000s)
    1
    2
    3
    4
    Revenues
    $400
    $420
    $441
    $463
    Supplies costs
    200
    210
    221
    232
    Net op. CF
    $100
    $105
    $110
    $116
    How were these values developed?
    Why haven’t we included depreciation?
    Labor costs
    100
    105
    110
    116
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Terminal cash flows at t = 4 (000s)
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.
    Salvage value
    $25
    Tax on SV
    0
    Net terminal CF
    $25

    0
    $100
    1
    $105
    2
    $110
    3
    $116
    4
    ($240)
    25
    $141
    Net cash flows (000s)
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.
    Note that these cash flows are estimates.

    Self-Test
    Which of the following factors would not have an impact on the cash flow estimates?
    The new equipment would require $5,000 in shipping costs.
    $25,000 was spent last year to improve the space that will house the equipment.
    The space for the equipment could be rented out for $1,000 per month.
    The new equipment would reduce the volume of an existing service line.
    The new equipment would increase accounts receivable by $20,000.
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    If this were a replacement rather than a new (expansion) project, would the analysis change?
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.
    The relevant operating cash flows would be the difference between the cash flows on the new and old project.
    Also, selling the old equipment would produce an immediate cash inflow, but the salvage value at the end of its original life is foregone.

    Breakeven Analysis
    There are many different approaches to breakeven in project analysis:
    Time breakeven
    Input variable breakeven
    Volume (4,142 versus 5,000 expected)
    Net revenue ($73.13 versus $80 expected)
    We will focus on time breakeven, which is measured by payback (or payback period).
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Payback Illustration
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.
    0
    $100
    1
    $105
    2
    $110
    3
    $141
    4
    ($240)
    Cumulative CFs:
    $ 75
    ($240)
    ($ 35)
    ($140)
    $216
    Payback = 2 + 35 / 110 = 2.3 years.

    Advantages of Payback:
    1. Easy to calculate and understand
    Provides an indication of a project’s risk and liquidity
    Disadvantages of Payback:
    1. Ignores time value
    2. Ignores all cash flows that occur after the payback period
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Profitability (ROI) Analysis
    Return on investment (ROI) analysis focuses on a project’s financial return.
    As with any investment, returns can be measured either in dollar terms or in rate of return (percentage) terms.
    Net present value (NPV) measures a project’s time value adjusted dollar return.
    Internal rate of return (IRR) measures a project’s rate of (percentage) return.
    Modified IRR (MIRR) also measures percentage return.
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Net Present Value (NPV)
    NPV measures return on investment (ROI) in dollar terms.
    NPV is merely the sum of the present values of the project’s net cash flows.
    The discount rate used is called the project cost of capital (PCC). If we assume that the illustrative project has average risk, its project cost of capital is the corporate cost of capital, 10%.
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Net Present Value (NPV) Calculation
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.
    0
    $100
    1
    $105
    2
    $110
    3
    $141
    4
    ($240.00)
    10%
    90.91
    86.78
    82.64
    96.30
    $116.63
    Thus, the project’s NPV is about $117,000.

    Spreadsheet Solution

    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Interpretation of the NPV
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.
    NPV is the excess dollar contribution of the project to the equity value of the business.
    A positive NPV signifies that the project will enhance the financial condition of the business.
    The greater the NPV, the more attractive the project financially.

    Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
    IRR measures ROI in percentage (rate of return) terms.
    It is the discount rate that forces the PV of the inflows to equal the cost of the project. In other words, it is the discount rate that forces the project’s NPV to equal $0.
    IRR is the project’s expected rate of return.
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    IRR Calculation (cont.)
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.
    0
    $100
    1
    $105
    2
    $110
    3
    $141
    4
    ($240.00)
    77.11
    62.46
    50.48
    49.95
    $ 0.00
    = NPV
    29.6%
    Thus, the project’s IRR is 29.6%.

    Spreadsheet Solution

    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Interpretation of the IRR
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.
    If a project’s IRR is greater than its cost of capital, then there is an “excess” return that contributes to the equity value of the business.
    In our example, IRR = 29.6 and the project cost of capital is 10%, so the project is expected to enhance Midtown Clinic’s financial condition.

    Self-Test
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.
    Which of the following statements is most correct?
    a. If NPV > $0, IRR PCC, NPV < $0.
    c. If NPV = $0, IRR = PCC.
    d. If IRR $0.
    e. If NPV PCC.

    PCC > IRR
    and NPV PCC
    and NPV > 0.
    Value is increased.
    Comparison of NPV and IRR
    Copyright © 2020 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.

    Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR)
    Both NPV and IRR require a reinvestment rate assumption.
    NPV assumes it is the cost of capital.
    IRR assumes it is the IRR rate.
    Of the two, reinvestment at the cost of capital is the better assumption.
    MIRR is a rate of return measure that forces reinvestment at the cost of capital.
    Copyright ©

    Expert paper writers are just a few clicks away

    Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.

    Calculate the price of your order

    You will get a personal manager and a discount.
    We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
    Total price:
    $0.00