Posted: February 28th, 2023

M370

HELP

2

[
Note: You will need to create and maintain a working outline of your final project for each milestone. Incorporate as much detail as possible as you progress through the course. This outline template will assist with organizing your final paper content but should not be submitted as your final submission. Be sure to refer to the milestone and final project rubrics for any additional details before submitting.

To complete this template, replace the bracketed text with your own content. Remove these notes before you submit your final case analysis.]

[Title of Paper: Subtitle]

[Your Name]

Southern New Hampshire University

PSY 570: Ethical Practice in Psychology

[Your Instructor’s Name]

2

[Date—for example, May 1, 2021]

I. Case Study Abstract

[Describe both the case study vignette and the approach to analyzing the case study.]

II. Case Study Description

[Summarize the chosen scenario, the important people, and the important interactions present in the case study.]

III. The Ethical Conflict

[Examine central ethical conflict of case study and assess interactions between different roles in the scenario.]

IV. The APA Code of Ethics Principles

[List and define all principles in an organized fashion and identify which principles might apply to case’s ethical conflict.]

V. The APA Code of Ethics Standards

[List and define all standards in an organized fashion and identify which standards might apply to case’s ethical conflict.]

VI. Statement of Culture and Social Orientations

[Identify and explain cultural and social considerations in case. If case does not have one, then create a hypothetical cultural or social consideration.]

VII. Statement of Multiple Relationship Issues

[Explain how considerations of multiple role relationship issues have influenced the development of the proposed ethical strategy and assess how strategy addresses ethical problems associated with multiple role relationship issues in your chosen case study.]

VIII. The Ethical Decision-Making Model (Eight Step Model)

[List the eight-step ethical decision-making model. Apply the model to the ethical conflict in your chosen case study.]

IX. An Alternative Decision-Making Model

[Describe an alternative decision-making model, then apply the model to ethical conflict in your chosen case study.]

X. Conclusion

[Comprehensively summarize your ethical strategy and discuss how it could be implemented to address the scenario.]

References

[Include any references cited in your paper in full APA format. Don’t forget to include in-text citations as well.]

PSY 570 Final Project Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric

Prompt: For Milestone Two, produce a document containing the rough outline using the template provided in your learning environment. You are expected to
address the first four elements (title page, case study abstract, detailed case study description, and ethical conflict). Remember that you will use instructor
feedback to further revise this milestone, which contains moving pieces of your final project submission.

Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed within the final project outline template:

1. Working title: Include a working title for the case study analysis (you are encouraged to flex your creative muscle).
2. Case Study Analysis Abstract: Include a preliminary draft of your abstract of your case study analysis, outlining both the case study vignette and your

approach to analyzing the case study.
3. Detailed Case Study Analysis Description: Summarize the chosen scenario, the important people, and the important interactions present in your chosen

case study.
4. The Ethical Conflict: Examine the central ethical conflict of the case study and assess interactions between different roles in the scenario.

Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font,
one-inch margins, and any referenced sources cited in APA format.

Rubric

Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Working Title Meets “Proficient” criteria
and working title
demonstrates creativity

Includes a working title for the
case study analysis

Includes a working title for the
case study analysis, but working
title is not in alignment with the
case study

Does not include a working
title for the case study
analysis

10

Case Study Analysis
Abstract

Meets “Proficient” criteria
and abstract is the
appropriate length

Includes a draft of the case study
analysis abstract that describes
both the case study vignette and
the approach to analyzing the
case study

Includes a draft of the case study
analysis abstract but does not
describe both case study
vignette and approach to
analyzing case study

Does not include a case
study analysis abstract

20

Detailed Case Study
Analysis Description

Meets “Proficient” criteria
and explains approach to
analyzing case study

Summarizes the chosen scenario,
the important people, and the
important interactions present in
the case study

Summarizes the chosen
scenario, the important people,
and the important interactions
present in the case study, but is
lacking in detail or breadth

Does not summarize the
chosen scenario, the
important people, and the
important interactions
present in the case study

30

Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value

The Ethical Conflict Meets “Proficient” criteria
and identifies a strategy for
resolving the central ethical
conflict

Examines central ethical conflict
of case study and assesses
interactions between different
roles in the scenario

Examines central ethical conflict
of case study and assesses
interactions between different
roles in the scenario, but
assessment lacks depth or detail

Does not examine central
ethical conflict of case study
or assess interaction
between different roles in
the scenario

30

APA Writing No errors related to APA style
or citations

Few errors related to related to
APA style and citations

Major errors related to APA style
and citations

Critical errors related to APA
style and citations

5

Articulation of
Response

Submission is free of errors
related to grammar, spelling,
syntax, and organization and
is presented in a professional
and easy to read format with
language that is appropriate
to the intended audience

Submission has no major errors
related to grammar, spelling,
syntax, organization or audience-
appropriate terminology

Submission has major errors
related to grammar, spelling,
syntax, organization, or
audience-appropriate language
that negatively impact
readability and articulation of
main ideas

Submission has critical errors
related to grammar, spelling,
syntax, organization, or
audience-specific language
that prevent understanding
of ideas

5

Total 100%