Posted: April 24th, 2025

PRESENTATION

TOPIC: Environmental Nursing Theory

The Presentation must be 15 slides in total and include SPEAKER NOTES on all slides. 

Address the information below for the PowerPoint Presentation and ensure that you follow the grading rubric below.

• Title Slide (Title, You Name, School Name, Course Number and Name, Professor Name, Date)
• Introduction of the Environmental Nursing Theorist.
• Classification of the theory (Grand Theory, Middle Range, Practice Level, etc.).
• Discuss the model/concept of the presented theory (theoretical overview).
• Applicability to nursing practice (Clinical or Professional Examples)
• Implications for Nursing Research (How will this theory advance nursing practice?)
• Conclusion (Summary)
• References no older than 5 years .

Due date October 18,2024 

No more than 10% plagiarism, will be submit Bt TURNIN IN.

SLIDES NEED TO HAVE PROPER AMOUNT OR INFORMATION, I CAN’T ACCEPT THE SLIDE ALMOST EMPTY OR WITH 2-3 SENTENCES, YOU CAN INCLUDE IMAGES IN SOME OF THEM.

Rubric for Collaborative Presentation – In-Class or Online (with Oral Delivery)

Criteria Unsatisfactory-Beginning Developing Accomplished Exemplary Total

Presentation/
Content
(

grade)

0-34 points 35-39 points 40-44 points 45-50 points /50

Presenta(on content shows a lack of
understanding of the topic. There is
inadequate evidence of research and
insufficient relevant informa(on and
facts. Content is confusing and/or
contains frequent inaccuracies.
Required elements are missing and/or
randomly organized. Sources, if
included, generally lack proper cita(on
format (APA 7th ed.).

Presenta(on content shows
general understanding of the topic.
There is limited evidence of
research in loca(ng relevant
informa(on and facts and/or
suppor(ng statements made.
Content contains some
inaccuracies, inconsistencies,
misinterpreta(ons, and/or
somewhat unclear. A required
element may be missing and/or
some sources may be improperly
cited (APA 7th ed.).

Presenta(on content shows an
adequate understanding of the topic.
Some research effort is evident in
loca(ng relevant informa(on and
facts. Content is mostly accurate and
reasonably organized. May contain
some inconsistencies in content or
some connec(ons made may not be
supported. Required elements are
included and sources are properly
cited (APA 7th ed.) for the most part.

Presenta(on content shows a
thorough understanding of the topic.
Substan(ve research effort is evident
in loca(ng relevant informa(on and
facts. Content is accurate and
sequenced in a clear, logical way. All
required elements are included and
sources are properly cited (APA 7th
ed.).

Presentation/
Design
(grade)

0-18 points 19 points 20-22 points 23-25 points /25

Slides generally lack visual appeal and
are text-heavy with liLle or no visuals
and/or exhibit an overuse of color or
anima(ons. Media, (e.g., images), if
used, are rarely cited on each slide. No
theme is evident and the presenta(on
appears disjointed rather than unified
and/or frequent errors (grammar,
punctua(on, spelling, formaPng, etc.)
on the slides

Slides generally include a mix of
white space, visuals, and/or text
but not consistently and/or some
overuse or inappropriate use of
color or anima(ons. Theme (e.g.,
template) is not consistently
evident throughout the
presenta(on and/or some errors
(grammar, punctua(on, spelling,
formaPng, etc.) on the slides.

Slides are effec(vely designed with
visual appeal including white space,
visuals, and minimal text for the most
part. Color and anima(ons are used
appropriately. Theme (e.g., template)
is evident in the presenta(on for the
most part to produce a cohesive
presenta(on and/or minor errors
(grammar, punctua(on, spelling,
formaPng, etc.) on the slides.

Slides are visually well designed,
aesthe(cally pleasing with
appropriate use of white space,
visuals, and minimal text, on each
slide. Color and anima(ons are used
judiciously. Theme (e.g., template) is
evident throughout to produce a
highly cohesive presenta(on.
Basically free from errors (grammar,
punctua(on, spelling, formaPng,
etc.) on the slides.

Presentation/
Oral Delivery

grade)

0-10 points 11 points 12-13 points 14-15 points /15

Ineffec(ve in delivering the oral
presenta(on demonstra(ng below
average/poor communica(on skills.
Substan(ally over/under the (me limit
to present and/or not all members
presented. Lack of prepara(on was
evident.

Somewhat effec(ve in delivering
the oral presenta(on
demonstra(ng average
communica(on skills. Slightly over/
under the (me limit. Some
members presented more than
others. More prepara(on was
needed.

Effec(ve in delivering the oral
presenta(on demonstra(ng good
communica(on skills and generally
close to the (me limit for the group to
present (20 minutes total). All group
members presented and prepara(on
was evident for the most part.

Highly effec(ve in delivering a well-
polished oral presenta(on within the
(me limit for the group to present
(20 minutes total). All group
members presented equally.
Prepara(on was strongly evident.

0-4 points 5 points 7 points 8-10 points

Presentation/
Notes/

Transcript
( grade

Presenta(on lacks “Notes” on slides (or
in a separate document) to explain
each slide and/or, if included, the notes
repeat the text provided on the slide.
Wri(ng demonstrates a below average/
poor wri(ng style with frequent errors
in spelling, grammar, punctua(on, and/
or usage.

Minimal “Notes” are included in
the presenta(on slides (or in a
separate document) and/or are
sporadically provided. Wri(ng
demonstrates an average wri(ng
style with some errors in spelling,
grammar, punctua(on, and/or
usage.

“Notes” are included in the
presenta(on (or in a separate
document) for the most part to
explain slides as a wriLen transcript.
Wri(ng demonstrates an above
average wri(ng style with liLle
grammar, punctua(on, spelling, and
or usage errors.

“Notes” are included in the
presenta(on (or in a separate
document) to fully explain each slide
as a wriLen transcript. Wri(ng
demonstrates a strong wri(ng style
basically free from grammar,
punctua(on, spelling, or usage
errors.

/10